EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 417 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 417 (2025) 06003 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 417, 2025
2025 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-AMI Conference: Bridging the Gap between Industry & Academia - The 26th Annual International RAPDASA Conference, joined by RobMech, PRASA and AMI, co-hosted by CSIR and Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Computational & Data-driven Modelling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541706003
Published online 25 November 2025
  1. D. Larcher, J. M. Tarascon, Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage, Nature, 7, 19-29 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. K. Jaiswal, C.R. Chowdhury, D. Yadav, R. Verma, S. Dutta, K.S. Jaiswal, K.S.K. Karuppasamy, Renewable and sustainable clean energy development and impact on social, economic, and environmental health, Energy Nexus., 7, 100118 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100118. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Kaliaperumal, M.S. Dharanendrakumar, S. Prasanna, K.V. Abhishek, R.K. Chidambaram, S. Adams, K. Zaghib, M.V. Reddy, M.V., Cause and mitigation of lithium-ion battery failure—A review, Materials, 14, 5676 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195676. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Li, Z. Du, R.E. Ruther, S.J. An, L.A. David, K. Hays, M. Wood, N.D. Phillip, Y. Sheng, C. Mao, S. Kalnaus, S Minerals, Toward low-cost, high-energy density, and high-power density lithium-ion batteries, Jom, 69, 1484-1496 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2404-9. [Google Scholar]
  5. M.S Tobchi, S. Gouchene and B. Dokkar, Simulation of species transport in metal air battery, Ph.D. thesis, Kasdi-Merbah Ouargla University, Faculty of Applied Sciences, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. L. Wang, D. Xu, J. J. Xu, X. B. Zhang, Oxygen electrocatalysts in metal–air batteries: from aqueous to nonaqueous electrolytes, Roy. Soc. Chem., 43, 7746-7786 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Liu, J. P. Vivek, E. W. Zhao, J. Lei, N. Garcia-Araez, C. P. Grey, Current challenges and routes forward for nonaqueous lithium–air batteries, Chem. Rev., 120, 6558-6625 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00545. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Kang, Y. Mo, S. P. Ong, and G. Ceder, A facile mechanism for recharging Li2O2 in Li–O2 batteries, Chem. Mater, 25, 3328–3336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm401720n. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Pan, X.L. Tian, S. Zaman, Z. Dong, H. Liu, H.S. Park, B.Y. Xia. Recent progress on transition metal oxides as bifunctional catalysts for lithium‐air and zinc‐air batteries, Batter. Supercaps, 2, 336-347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.201800082. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Cui, G. Du, K. Zhang, T. An, B. Li, X. Liu, Z. Liu, J. Co3O4 nanoparticles anchored in MnO2 nanorods as efficient oxygen reduction reaction catalyst for metal-air batteries, J. Alloys Compd., 814, 152239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152239. [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Fuchs, J. Furthmüller, F. Bechstedt, M. Shishkin, G. Kresse, Quasiparticle band structure based on a generalized Kohn-Sham scheme, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 76, 115109 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.115109. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 38651996 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Grimme, A. Hansen, J. G. Brandenburg, C. Bannwarth, Dispersion-corrected mean-field electronic structure methods, Chem. Rev, 116, 5105-5154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00533. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Hatz, M. Korpinen, V. Hänninen, L. Halonen J. Characterization of the dispersion interactions and an ab initio study of van der Waals potential energy parameters for coinage metal clusters, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 11685–11693 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp307448n. [Google Scholar]
  15. S.L. Dudarev, G.A Botton, S.Y. Savrasov, C.J. Humphreys, A.P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+ U study, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter., 57, 1505 – 1509 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505. [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Jiang, H. Sun, W. Shi, T. Zhou, J. Hu, J. Cheng, P. Hu, S. Sun, Co3O4 nanocage derived from metal-organic frameworks: An excellent cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li-O 2 battery, Nano Res., 12, 1555-1562 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-019-2388-6. [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Tian, M. D. Radin, D. J. Siegel, Enhanced charge transport in amorphous Li2O2, Chem. Mater., 26, 2952–2959 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1021/cm5007372. [Google Scholar]
  18. X. Liu and C. T. Prewitt, High-temperature X-ray diffraction study of Co 3 O 4: Transition from normal to disordered spinel, Phys. Chem. Miner., 17, 168-172 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Cadi-Essadek, A. Roldan, D. Santos-Carballal, P. E. Ngoepe, M. Claeys, N. H. de Leeuw, DFT+ U study of the electronic, magnetic and mechanical properties of Co, CoO, and Co3O4, S. Afr. J. Chem., 74, 8–16 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Behera, D. Seth, M. Agarwal, M. A. Haider, A. J. Bhattacharyya, Exploring Cu-Doped Co3O4 Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysts for Aqueous Zn–Air Batteries, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces., 16, 17574–17586 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c00571. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Hafner, Density‐functional theory and beyond, J. Comput. Chem., 29, 2044-2078 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21057. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.