EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 417 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 417 (2025) 04019 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 417, 2025
2025 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-AMI Conference: Bridging the Gap between Industry & Academia - The 26th Annual International RAPDASA Conference, joined by RobMech, PRASA and AMI, co-hosted by CSIR and Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria
Article Number 04019
Number of page(s) 15
Section Robotics and Mechatronics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541704019
Published online 25 November 2025
  1. Q. Han, Y. Bao, S. Pasricha, Improving Safety in Cyber Enabled Underground Mines, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networking, Systems and Security, New York, USA, 21-23 December, 21 December (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Neumann, A. Ferrein, S. Kallweit, I. Scholl, Towards a Mobile Mapping Robot for Underground Mines, in Proceedings of the 2014 PRASA, RobMech and AfLaT International Joint Symposium, Cape Town, South Africa, 27-28 November, 27 November (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Tatsch, J. A. Bredu, D. Covell, I. B. Tulu, Y. Gu, Rhino: An Autonomous Robot for Mapping Underground Mine Environments, in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Seattle, USA, 28-30 June, 28 June (2023) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Tranzatto, T. Miki, M. Dharmadhikari, L. Bernreiter, M. Kulkarni, F. Mascarich, O. Andersson, S. Khattak, M. Hutter, R. Siegwart, K. Alexis, CERBERUS in the DARPA Subterranean Challenge, Sci. Robot. 7, 66 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abp9742 [Google Scholar]
  5. P. De Petris, H. Nguyen, M. Dharmadhikari, M. Kulkarni, N. Khedekar, F. Mascarich, K. Alexis, Rmf-owl: A collision-tolerant flying robot for autonomous subterranean exploration, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21-24 June, 21 June (2022) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Pålsson, M. Smedberg, Investigating Simultaneous Localization and Mapping for AGV systems, Master Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Zimmermann, Trajectory (re)planning of a quadcopter in indoor environments with unknown obstacles, Diploma Thesis, TU Wien, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Li, S. Zlatanova, M. Koopman, X. Bai, A. Diakité, Universal path planning for an indoor drone, Autom. Constr. 95, 275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.025 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Farooq, C. Laoudias, P. S. Kolios, T. Theocharides, Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Indoor Exploration Algorithms for Autonomous UAVs, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21-24 June, 21 June (2022) [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Zhou, Y. Zhang, X. Chen, S. Shen, FUEL: Fast UAV Exploration Using Incremental Frontier Structure and Hierarchical Planning, IEEE robot. autom. lett. 6, 779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3051563 [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Lindqvist, A. Patel, K. Löfgren, G. Nikolakopoulos, A Tree-Based Next-Best-Trajectory Method for 3-D UAV Exploration, IEEE Trans. Robot. 40, 3496 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2024.3422052 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. M. Lee, D. Choi, H. Myung, Peacock Exploration: A Lightweight Exploration for UAV Using Control-Efficient Trajectory, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications, Singapore, 11-13 December, 11 December (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. S. Al-Batati, A. Koubaa, M. Abdelkader, ROS 2 Key Challenges and Advances: A Survey of ROS 2 Research, Libraries, and Applications, preprints202410.1204 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Casuccio, ROS2-Based AMR System for Mapping and Navigation in Unknown Indoor Environments, Master Thesis, Polytechnic University of Turin, Italy, (2024) [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Portugal, R. P. Rocha, J. P. Castilho, Inquiring the robot operating system community on the state of adoption of the ROS 2 robotics middleware, Int. J. Intell. Robot. Appl. 9, 454 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00393-4 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flyability, Elios 3, flyability.com [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Jarahizadeh, B. Salehi, A Comparative Analysis of UAV Photogrammetric Software Performance for Forest 3D Modeling: A Case Study Using AgiSoft Photoscan, PIX4DMapper, and DJI Terra, Sensors 24, 286 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010286 [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Zhou, H. Xu, S. Shen, RACER: Rapid Collaborative Exploration With a Decentralized Multi-UAV System, IEEE Trans. Robot. 39, 1816 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2023.3236945 [Google Scholar]
  19. A Hornung, K. M.Wurm, M. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, W. Burgard, OctoMap: an efficient probabilistic 3D mapping framework based on octrees, Auton. Robot. 34, 189 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-012-9321-0 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Fredriksson, A. Saradagi, G. Nikolakopoulos, Voxel Map to Occupancy Map Conversion Using Free Space Projection for Efficient Map Representation for Aerial and Ground Robots, IEEE robot. autom. lett. 9, 11625 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2024.3495575 [Google Scholar]
  21. S. M. LaValle, J. J. Kuffner, Randomized Kinodynamic Planning, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, USA, 10-15 May (1999), 06 August (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1999.770022 [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Karaman, E. Frazzoli, Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning, Int. J. Robot. Res. 30, 846 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364911406761 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Yamauchi, A Frontier-Based Approach for Autonomous Exploration, in Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, Monterey, CA, USA, 10-11 July (1997), 06 August (2002) [Google Scholar]
  24. iFlight, R5 2207 2050KV FPV Motor Pro, shop.iflight.com (accessed March 21, 2024) [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Liang, Propellers: The Complete Guide, oscarliang.com (accessed March 22, 2024) [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Kalyanasundaram, Y. Simmhan, ARM Wrestling with Big Data: A Study of Commodity ARM64 Server for Big Data Workloads, in Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Jaipur, India, 18-21 December (2017), 08 February (2018) [Google Scholar]
  27. Khadas Documentation Team, “VIM4 Getting Started”, docs.khadas.com (accessed May 05, 2024) [Google Scholar]
  28. O. Seiskari, P. Rantalankila, J. Kannala, J. Ylilammi, E. Rahtu, A. Solin, HybVIO: Pushing the limits of real-time visual-inertial odometry, in Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, New Orleans, USA, 18-24 June (2022), 18 June (2022) [Google Scholar]
  29. Open Robotics Foundation, “SubT Tech Repo,” app.gazebosim.org [Google Scholar]
  30. PX4 Developer Team, PX4 Flight Stack – Multicopter Control Architecture, docs.px4.io (accessed September 15, 2024) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.