EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 417 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 417 (2025) 04012 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 417, 2025
2025 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-AMI Conference: Bridging the Gap between Industry & Academia - The 26th Annual International RAPDASA Conference, joined by RobMech, PRASA and AMI, co-hosted by CSIR and Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria
Article Number 04012
Number of page(s) 10
Section Robotics and Mechatronics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541704012
Published online 25 November 2025
  1. W.R. Hansen, K. Autumn, Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 385-389, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408304102 [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Li, J. Krahn, & C. Menon, Bioinspired Dry Adhesive Materials and Their Application in Robotics: A Review. J Bionic Eng. 13, 181–199. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60293-7 [Google Scholar]
  3. Y.I. Rabinovich, J.J. Adler, A. Ata, R.K. Singh, and B.M. Moudgil, Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces: I. Role of Asperity Geometry, J Colloid and Interface Science, 232, 10–16 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Huber, S.N. Gorb, N. Hosoda, R. Spolenak, E. Arzt, Influence of surface roughness on gecko adhesion, Acta Biomaterialia, 3, 607–610, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  5. B.N.J. Persson, S.N. Gorb. The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic plates with application to biological systems. J Chem Phys, 119, 11437–11444, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1621854 [Google Scholar]
  6. K.Autumn, Y.A. Liang, S.T. Hsieh, W. Zesch, W.P. Chan, T.W. Kenny, R. Fearing, & R.J. Full, Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature. 40, 681–685, (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35015073 [Google Scholar]
  7. W.Wang, Y. Liu, & Z. Xie, Gecko-Like Dry Adhesive Surfaces and Their Applications: A Review. J Bionic Eng 18, 1011–1044 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-00088-7 [Google Scholar]
  8. AN. Gent. On the relation between indentation hardness and Young’s modulus. Ruber Chemistry and Technology, 31, 896 – 906, (1958). https://www.doi.org/10.5254/1.3542351 [Google Scholar]
  9. J.Y. Chung, and K.C. Manoj, Soft and hard adhesion, Journal of adhesion, 81, 1119-1145, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/00218460500310887 [Google Scholar]
  10. I.M. Meththananda, S. Parker, M.P. Patel, M. Braden. The relationship between Shore hardness of elastomeric dental materials and Young’s modulus. Dent Mater, 25, 956-959, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. W. D. Callister, D. G. Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, (John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Lomölder, F. Plogmann, F. & P. Speier, Selectivity of isophorone diisocyanate in the urethane reaction influence of temperature, catalysis, and reaction partners. J. Coatings Technology, 69, 51–57 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696250 [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Brondi, E. Di Maio, L. Bertucelli, V. Parenti, T. Mosciatti, Competing bubble formation mechanisms in rigid polyurethane foaming, Polymer, 228, 123877, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123877. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brondi C, Santiago-Calvo M, Di Maio E, Rodríguez-Perez MÁ. Role of Air Bubble Inclusion on Polyurethane Reaction Kinetics. Materials (Basel), 15, 3132, (2022) https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093135 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Hamann, S. Andrieux, M. Schütte, D. Telkemeyer, M. Ranft, W Drenckhan Directing the pore size of rigid polyurethane foam via controlled air entrainment, J. Cellular Plastics, 59, 201-214. (2023) doi:10.1177/0021955X231152680 [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Zuev. Elastomer–Gas Systems. International Polymer Science and Technology, 28, 43-53, (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0307174X0102800213 [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Léger and C. Creton, Adhesion mechanisms at soft polymer interfaces, Phil. Trans. R. Soc A, 366, 1425–1442, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2166 [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Zhang, R. Adams and L.F.M. Silva, Effects of Curing Cycle and Thermal History on the Glass Transition Temperature of Adhesives. J of Adhesion, 90, (2014). https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2013.795116. [Google Scholar]
  19. J.R. Bausch, C. Delange and C.L. Davidson, The influence of temperature on some physical properties of dental composites. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 8 309-317. (1981). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00505.x [Google Scholar]
  20. D.A. Covey, S.R. Tahaney, J.M. Davenport, Mechanical properties of heat-treated composite resin restorative materials, J. Prosthetic Dentistry, 68, 458-461, (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90410-C [Google Scholar]
  21. M.A. Loza-Herrero, E. Rueggeberg, W.E. Caughman, G.S. Schuster, C.A. Lefebvre, E. Gardner. Effect of Heating Delay on Conversion and Strength of a Post-cured Resin Composite, J. Dental Research, 77, 426-431, (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770021201 [Google Scholar]
  22. S.L. Wendt, The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability, Quintessence International, 18, 351-356, (1987). [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Cracknell, M. Akay, Kinetics of curing reactions for epoxy-amine / polyethersulphone resins, J. Therm. Anal, 40, 565-573, (1993) [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Meier, CoolTerm, ver 2.4.0, (2025), Available at: https://freeware.the-meiers.org/ [Google Scholar]
  25. B.F. Ryan, T. A. Ryan and B.L. Joiner, MiniTab, ver 18.1, (2017) Available at: https://www.minitab.com/en-us/support/downloads/ [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Wang,T. Liu,H. Tian,J. Zhang,Q. He,X. Li,C. Wang,X. Chen, & J. Shao, Stiffness-gradient adhesive structure with mushroom-shaped morphology via electrically activated one-step growth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 122, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2423039122 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.