EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 417 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 417 (2025) 02008 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 417, 2025
2025 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-AMI Conference: Bridging the Gap between Industry & Academia - The 26th Annual International RAPDASA Conference, joined by RobMech, PRASA and AMI, co-hosted by CSIR and Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 13
Section Computational & Data-driven Modelling seminar
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541702008
Published online 25 November 2025
  1. A.Vaziri, G. Moradkhani, F. Farahmand, M. Karimpour, M. Tahmasebi, F. Vosoughi, M. Salimi, and R. Shayan-Moghadam, “Utilizing 3d-printed patient-specific porous titanium cones in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty,” Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 35, 96 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04229-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Kuntoğlu, E. Salur, M. K. Gupta, S. Waqar, N. Szczotkarz, G. Vashishtha, M. E. Korkmaz, G. M. Krolczyk, A. Aslan, et al., “A review on surface morphology and tribological behavior of titanium alloys via SLM processing,” Rapid Prototyp. J. 31, 271–285 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2024-0328. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC), Abuja, Nigeria and A.-A. Barambu Umar, “Framework for Adoption of Metal Additive Manufacturing in the Oil and Gas Industry in Africa,” J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol., 1–10 (2023) https://doi.org/10.47363/JEAST/2023(5)196. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. A. Lee, J. Park, M. J. Sagong, S. Y. Ahn, J.-W. Cho, S. Lee, and H. S. Kim, “Active learning framework to optimize process parameters for additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4V with high strength and ductility,” Nat. Commun. 16, 931 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56267-1. [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Meng, B. McWilliams, W. Jarosinski, H.-Y. Park, Y.-G. Jung, J. Lee, and J. Zhang, “Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: A Review,” JOM 72, 2363–2377 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y. [Google Scholar]
  6. I.-T. Yu, “Factor screening with modified one-factor-at-a-time experiments,” Commun. Stat. - Simul. Comp. 53, 4449–4463 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2022.2154793. [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Thamprasert, A. Y. Dawod, and N. Chakpitak, “Simulated trial and error experiments on productivity,” IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. IJ-AI 11, 1570 (2022). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v11.i4.pp1570-1578. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Ebrahimpour, M. Omidi, and A. Mostafapour, “Multiscale FE modeling of SLMed ASS316 L reinforced with nanoparticles during FSP: exploring the impact of particle volume fraction, shape, and type on mechanical strength,” Weld. World 69, 1135–1147 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-025-01985-9. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. K. R, R. Ranganathan, S. A, R. Velu, V. S. Jatti, D. G. Mohan, and P. Vijayakumar, “Achieving multi-response optimization of control parameters for Wire-EDM on additive manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy using Taguchi-grey relational theory,” Eng. Res. Express 7, 015404 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ada225. [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Zhang and Y. Wu, “Introducing Machine Learning Models to Response Surface Methodologies,” in Response Surf. Methodol. Eng. Sci., P. Kayaroganam, Ed. (IntechOpen, 2021). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98191. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. J. J. Van Houtum and M. L. Vlasea, “Active learning via adaptive weighted uncertainty sampling applied to additive manufacturing,” Addit. Manuf. 48, 102411 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102411. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Nasrin, M. Pourali, F. Pourkamali-Anaraki, and A. M. Peterson, “Active learning for prediction of tensile properties for material extrusion additive manufacturing,” Sci. Rep. 13, 11460 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38527-6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Q. Yubin, C. Xiang, C. Ruijie, J. Xiaolin, and G. Jiangfeng, “Active Learning using Uncertainty Sampling and Query-by-Committee for Software Defect Prediction,” Int. J. Perform. Eng. 15, 2701 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23940/ijpe.19.10.p16.27012708. [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Hino and S. Eguchi, “Active learning by query by committee with robust divergences,” Inf. Geom. 6, 81–106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41884-022-00081-x. [Google Scholar]
  15. C. A. Steed, ‘Automated Modeling and Control of Steady State Engineering Processes using Deep Active Learning’, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5353778. [Google Scholar]
  16. W. Cai, Y. Zhang, and J. Zhou, “Maximizing Expected Model Change for Active Learning in Regression,” in 2013 IEEE 13th Int. Conf. Data Min., (IEEE, Dallas, TX, USA, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2013.104. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. M. Ann Rudolph, “Near-Beta Titanium Alloys Produced Using Laser Powder-Bed Fusion,” Masters thesis (Stellenbosch University, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  18. H.-T. Chung, C.-C. Tsai, K.-K. Jen, Y.-S. Huang, Y.-C. Ferng, C.-Y. Lo, T.-W. Chen, K.-H. Chang, and A.-C. Yeh, “Optimization of process parameters of selective laser melted nickel-based superalloy for densification by random forest regression algorithm and response surface methodology,” Results Eng. 22, 102182 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102182. [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Yang, M. Cao, Y. Cai, B. Yang, H. Gan, B. Fu, L. Li, Y. Wang, and M. M. F. Yuen, “Density prediction for selective laser melting fabricated of CuCrZr alloy using hybrid Gaussian boosted regression,” J. Laser Appl. 37, 012023 (2025). https://doi.org/10.2351/7.0001414. [Google Scholar]
  20. N. C. Igwe, I. Akhrif, M. El Jai, and B. El Fahime, “An experimental investigation of the influence of SLM input factors on the as-built AlSi10Mg surface quality,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 136, 619–674 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14657-7. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Bakhtiarian, H. Omidvar, A. Mashhuriazar, Z. Sajuri, and C. H. Gur, “The effects of SLM process parameters on the relative density and hardness of austenitic stainless steel 316L,” J. Mater. Res. Technol. 29, 1616–1629 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.237. [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Dkhili, S. Thil, J. Eynard, and S. Grieu, “Comparative study between Gaussian process regression and long short-term memory neural networks for intraday grid load forecasting,” in 2020 IEEE Int. Conf. Environ. Electr. Eng. 2020 IEEE Ind. Commer. Power Syst. Eur. EEEIC ICPS Eur., (IEEE, Madrid, Spain, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope49358.2020.9160537. [Google Scholar]
  23. A.M. Chung Baek, E. Park, M. Seong, J. Koo, I.D. Jung, N. Kim, Multi-objective robust parameter optimization using the extended and weighted k-means (EWK-means) clustering in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), Expert Systems with Applications 236, 121349 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121349. [Google Scholar]
  24. A.M. Chung Baek, T. Kim, M. Seong, S. Lee, H. Kang, E. Park, I.D. Jung, N. Kim, Multimodal deep learning for enhanced temperature prediction with uncertainty quantification in directed energy deposition (DED) process, Virtual and Physical Prototyping 20, e2474532, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2025.2474532 [Google Scholar]
  25. C.A. Steed, Automated Modeling and Control of Steady State Engineering Processes using Deep Active Learning, (2025). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5353778. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.