EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 415 (2025) MATEC Web Conf., 415 (2025) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 415, 2025
International Colloquium on Mechanical and Civil Engineering (ICMCE’2025)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Processes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541501003
Published online 27 October 2025
  1. G. Formentini, N. Boix Rodríguez, and C. Favi, “Design for manufacturing and assembly methods in the product development process of mechanical products: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 120, no. 7–8, pp. 4307–4334, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-08837-6. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. T. Zaringhalam, M. Khalilzadeh, and O. F. Valilai, “An interactive and integrated framework for collaborative product development in cloud manufacturing using STEP standard-based ontology model,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2025, 2023, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1530. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Yazid, R. Ginting, and N. Panjaitan, “Integration of Design for Manufacture and Assembly with Product Design in Product Design Improvement: A Systematic Literature Review,” J. Sist. Tek. Ind., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2024, doi: 10.32734/jsti.v26i2.13643. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Favi, M. Mandolini, F. Campi, P. Cicconi, R. Raffaeli, and M. Germani, Design for Manufacturing and Assembly: A Method for Rules Classification, vol. 1. Springer International Publishing, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70566-4_56. [Google Scholar]
  5. F. M. Monetti and A. Maffei, Towards the definition of assembly-oriented modular product architectures: a systematic review, vol. 35, no. 2. Springer London, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s00163-023-00427-1. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Maltauro, E. Vargiu, R. Meneghello, and G. Concheri, “Design for assembly principles applied to deformable parts, a natural frequency based methodology for interfaces design,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12008-024-02087-4. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Maltauro, G. Passarotto, G. Concheri, and R. Meneghello, “Bridging the gap between design and manufacturing specifications for non-rigid parts using the influence coefficient method,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 127, no. 1–2, pp. 579–597, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-11480-4. [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Ginting, A. Ishak, and A. F. Malik, “Product development and design with a combination of design for manufacturing or assembly and quality function deployment: A literature review,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2217, no. April, 2020, doi: 10.1063/5.0000739. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. I. Juniani, M. L. Singgih, and P. D. Karningsih, “Design for Manufacturing, Assembly, and Reliability: An Integrated Framework for Product Redesign and Innovation,” Designs, vol. 6, no. 5, 2022, doi: 10.3390/designs6050088. [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Campi, C. Favi, M. Germani, and M. Mandolini, “CAD-integrated design for manufacturing and assembly in mechanical design,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 282–325, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2021.1992659. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Elsouri, J. Gao, C. Simmonds, and N. Martin, “A design for manufacturing methodology using defects knowledge for aerospace product manufacturing,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., vol. 235, no. 11, pp. 1751–1762, 2021, doi: 10.1177/09544054211007642. [Google Scholar]
  12. C. D. Naiju, “DFMA for product designers: A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 46, pp. 7473–7478, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.134. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. I. de Oliveira, M. D. Dos Santos, and A. C. Kieling, “the Integration of Dfma (Design for Manufacturing and Assembly) and Reverse Engineering (Er) Applied To a Landing Gear Redesign,” J. Eng. Technol. Ind. Appl., vol. 7, no. 31, pp. 4–10, 2021, doi: 10.5935/jetia.v7i31.775. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Favi, M. Germani, and M. Mandolini, “A Multi-objective Design Approach to Include Material, Manufacturing and Assembly Costs in the Early Design Phase,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 52, pp. 251–256, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.043. [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Li, R. Wu, and W. Yang, “Optimization and selection of the multi-objective conceptual design scheme for considering product assembly, manufacturing and cost,” SN Appl. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42452-022-04973-6. [Google Scholar]
  16. U. M. Dilberoglu, B. Gharehpapagh, U. Yaman, and M. Dolen, “The Role of Additive Manufacturing in the Era of Industry 4.0,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 11, no. June, pp. 545–554, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Shahhoseini, S. Heydari, and S. Pedrammehr, “Manufacturing and Assembly for the Ease of Product Recycling: A Review,” Designs, vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.3390/designs7020042. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. H. P. Setti, O. Canciglieri Junior, and C. C. A. Estorilio, “Integrated product development method based on Value Engineering and design for assembly concepts,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 21, no. October 2020, p. 100199, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2020.100199. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. M. Antony and S. Arunkumar, “DFMA and Sustainability Analysis in Product Design,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1455, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1455/1/012028. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Sauerwein, E. Doubrovski, R. Balkenende, and C. Bakker, “Exploring the potential of additive manufacturing for product design in a circular economy,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 226, pp. 1138–1149, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.108. [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Bouissiere, C. Cuiller, P. E. Dereux, C. Malchair, C. Favi, and G. Formentini, “Conceptual design for assembly in aerospace industry: A method to assess manufacturing and assembly aspects of product architectures,” Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des. ICED, vol. 2019-Augus, no. AUGUST, pp. 2961–2970, 2019, doi: 10.1017/dsi.2019.303. [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Favi, M. Germani, and M. Mandolini, “Multi-objective conceptual design: An approach to make cost-efficient the design for manufacturing and assembly in the development of complex products,” Adv. Mech. Des. Eng. Manuf., pp. 63–71, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_7. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Nafisi, M. Wiktorsson, and C. Rösiö, “Manufacturing Involvement in New Product Development: An Explorative Case Study in Heavy Automotive Component Assembly,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 50, pp. 65–69, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.201. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. S. Cuellar, G. Smit, D. Plettenburg, and A. Zadpoor, “Additive manufacturing of non-assembly mechanisms,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 21, no. January, pp. 150–158, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.004. [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Lussenburg, A. Sakes, and P. Breedveld, “Design of non-assembly mechanisms: A state-of-the-art review,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 39, no. May 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101846. [Google Scholar]
  26. H. I. Medellin-Castillo and J. Zaragoza-Siqueiros, “Design and Manufacturing Strategies for Fused Deposition Modelling in Additive Manufacturing: A Review,” Chinese J. Mech. Eng. (English Ed., vol. 32, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s10033-019-0368-0. [Google Scholar]
  27. I. Melckenbeeck, S. Burggraeve, B. Van Doninck, J. Vancraen, and A. Rosich, “Optimal assembly sequence based on design for assembly (DFA) rules,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 91, no. March, pp. 646–652, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.223. [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Corrado and W. Polini, “Assembly design in aeronautic field: From assembly jigs to tolerance analysis,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., vol. 231, no. 14, pp. 2652–2663, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0954405416635033. [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Asadollahi-Yazdi, J. Gardan, and P. Lafon, “Integrated Design in Additive Manufacturing Based on Design for Manufacturing,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Mech. Aerospace, Ind. Mechatron. Manuf. Eng., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1044–1051, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Oh, C. Zhou, and S. Behdad, “Part decomposition and assembly-based (Re) design for additive manufacturing: A review,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 22, no. March, pp. 230–242, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.